Molecular Pathology
Sarah Siahbani; Akbar Safaie; Masoumeh Faghih; Marzieh Hosseini; Afsaneh Fendereski; Behnaz Valibeigi; Ahmad Monabati
Abstract
Background & Objective: Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL) is a medical emergency with potentially fatal complications. APL primarily results from a chromosomal translocation (t(15;17)(q22;q21)), leading to the formation of the PML-RARA fusion gene with three possible isoforms. This study aims to ...
Read More
Background & Objective: Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL) is a medical emergency with potentially fatal complications. APL primarily results from a chromosomal translocation (t(15;17)(q22;q21)), leading to the formation of the PML-RARA fusion gene with three possible isoforms. This study aims to investigate the characteristics of Iranian APL patients, the distribution of PML-RARA isoforms, and survival analysis.Methods: We included 145 consecutive eligible patients in this study. Data were collected through archived documents and phone inquiries, following consent. Subsequently, we analyzed the data using SPSS software version 26.0.Results: We examined 75 men and 70 women, with a mean age of 34 years (range: 2-78 years). Besides t(15;17) (q22;q21), 45.6% had other chromosomal abnormalities. The prevalence of bcr1 and bcr3 isoforms was 73% and 27%, respectively. bcr3 correlated with higher white blood cell (WBC) counts, additional chromosomal abnormalities, and faster Complete Hematologic Response (CHR). Early death occurred in approximately 36% of all patients. The mean overall survival time was 73.5 months, with 120-month survival rates of 53.8% for all patients and 83.9% for those who achieved CHR. Univariate analysis identified old age, relapse, lower platelet (PLT) counts, higher WBC counts, and leukocytosis as survival risk factors. However, in multivariate analysis, only old age and higher WBC counts were identified as adverse prognostic factors.Conclusion: In Iranian APL patients, bcr1 predominates, while bcr3 correlates with higher WBC counts, high-risk categorization, additional chromosomal abnormalities, and faster CHR. Survival is negatively impacted by old age, relapse, lower PLT counts, higher WBC counts, and leukocytosis.
Hematopathology
Alireza Rezvani; Ahmad Monabati; Zahra Kargar; Akbar Safaie; Mahdi Mahmoodzadeh; Hamideh Moosapour; Marzieh Hosseini; Soleiman Kheiri; Elham Taheri
Abstract
Background & Objective: Some of the patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) are categorized as good prognosis based on the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R). However, these patients may have poor clinical outcomes. It seems that the current diagnostic tools and IPSS-R ...
Read More
Background & Objective: Some of the patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) are categorized as good prognosis based on the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R). However, these patients may have poor clinical outcomes. It seems that the current diagnostic tools and IPSS-R cannot consider genetic factors for determining the prognosis of MDS patients.Methods: This cross-sectional study included all adult MDS patients of both genders who were admitted from March 2015 to March 2020 to the Hematology wards of two educational tertiary hospitals in Iran (Namazi and Faghihi, affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences). Study data included relevant retrospective data from medical records and the results of immunohistochemical p53 staining on bone marrow biopsies.Results: Of the 84 patients, 65 (77.4%) showed p53 expression in bone marrow. They had shorter median survival than those without p53 expression. Considering both variables of P53 IHC results and IPSS-R score, the patients who died with low-risk IPSS-R score presented high p53 expression.Conclusion: This study shows that the investigation of p53 expression by IHC at the time of diagnosis is a valuable indicator of survival rate in MDS patients. These data suggest that the immunohistochemical analysis of p53 can be a prognostic tool for MDS and should be used as an adjunct test to make decisions on the best therapeutic choice.